On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:27:19AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 1:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

virtio core already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>

---

Depends on the first patch.
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
index fcc5e8c08973..9fae8e396c58 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c

@@ -653,7 +653,6 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_gpio_driver = {
        .remove                 = virtio_gpio_remove,
        .driver                 = {
                .name           = KBUILD_MODNAME,
-               .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
        },
 };
 module_virtio_driver(virtio_gpio_driver);

--

2.34.1

Applied, thanks!

Did you also applied the first patch of this series?

Without that I'm not sure it's a good idea to apply this patch as also
Krzysztof mentioned after ---.

Thanks,
Stefano