Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2023-10-31

Re: [RFC] vdpa/mlx5: preserve CVQ vringh index

From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2023-10-31 01:26:15
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 10:06 PM Steven Sistare
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 10/27/2023 2:31 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:07 AM Steve Sistare [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
mlx5_vdpa does not preserve userland's view of vring base for the control
queue in the following sequence:

ioctl VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE
ioctl VHOST_VDPA_SET_STATUS VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
  mlx5_vdpa_set_status()
    setup_cvq_vring()
      vringh_init_iotlb()
        vringh_init_kern()
          vrh->last_avail_idx = 0;
ioctl VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE

To fix, restore the value of cvq->vring.last_avail_idx after calling
vringh_init_iotlb.

Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <redacted>
---
 drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c |  7 ++++++-
 drivers/vhost/vringh.c            | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/vringh.h            |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
index 946488b8989f..f64758143115 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
@@ -2795,13 +2795,18 @@ static int setup_cvq_vring(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev)
        struct mlx5_control_vq *cvq = &mvdev->cvq;
        int err = 0;

-       if (mvdev->actual_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ))
+       if (mvdev->actual_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ)) {
+               u16 last_avail_idx = cvq->vring.last_avail_idx;
+
                err = vringh_init_iotlb(&cvq->vring, mvdev->actual_features,
                                        MLX5_CVQ_MAX_ENT, false,
                                        (struct vring_desc *)(uintptr_t)cvq->desc_addr,
                                        (struct vring_avail *)(uintptr_t)cvq->driver_addr,
                                        (struct vring_used *)(uintptr_t)cvq->device_addr);

+               if (!err)
+                       vringh_set_base_iotlb(&cvq->vring, last_avail_idx);
Btw, vringh_set_base_iotlb() deserves an independent patch and it
seems it is not specific to IOTLB,
Agreed on both.  I initially submitted the smallest change needed to show the problem.

so we probably need an indirection
quoted
to have vringh_set_base() first.
Not sure what you mean.  I have defined:

    static inline int __vringh_set_base() ...

    int vringh_set_base_iotlb()
        return __vringh_set_base(vrh, idx, putu16_iotlb);

to which I would add:

    int vringh_set_base_user()
        return __vringh_set_base(vrh, idx, putu16_user);

    int vringh_set_base_kern()
        return __vringh_set_base(vrh, idx, putu16_kern;

all in the same patch.

The call site in mlx5_vnet.c would be a 2nd patch.
Right, so we just need to split it.
- Steve
quoted
Or I wonder if it's better to just introduce a new parameter to
vringh_init_iotlb()...
I considered that, but IMO the parameter list there is already large, and it would
be strange to add a parameter for the initial value of avail, but not for used, and
no one needs the latter.
Fine.

Thanks
- Steve
quoted
quoted
+       }
        return err;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
index 7b8fd977f71c..799762c83007 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
@@ -595,6 +595,24 @@ static inline void __vringh_notify_disable(struct vringh *vrh,
        }
 }

+static inline int __vringh_set_base(struct vringh *vrh, u16 idx,
+                           int (*putu16)(const struct vringh *vrh,
+                               __virtio16 *p, u16 val))
+{
+    int ret;
+
+    ret = putu16(vrh, &vrh->vring.avail->idx, idx);
+    if (ret)
+        return ret;
+
+    ret = putu16(vrh, &vrh->vring.used->idx, idx);
+    if (ret)
+        return ret;
+
+    vrh->last_avail_idx = vrh->last_used_idx = idx;
+    return 0;
+}
+
 /* Userspace access helpers: in this case, addresses are really userspace. */
 static inline int getu16_user(const struct vringh *vrh, u16 *val, const __virtio16 *p)
 {
@@ -1456,6 +1474,18 @@ void vringh_set_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_set_iotlb);

+/**
+ * vringh_set_base_iotlb - set avail_idx and used_idx
+ * @vrh: the vring
+ * @idx: the value to set
+ */
+int vringh_set_base_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, u16 idx)
+{
+    return __vringh_set_base(vrh, idx, putu16_iotlb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_set_base_iotlb);
+
+
 /**
  * vringh_getdesc_iotlb - get next available descriptor from ring with
  * IOTLB.
diff --git a/include/linux/vringh.h b/include/linux/vringh.h
index c3a8117dabe8..e9b8af4e6a5e 100644
--- a/include/linux/vringh.h
+++ b/include/linux/vringh.h
@@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ int vringh_init_iotlb_va(struct vringh *vrh, u64 features,
                         struct vring_avail *avail,
                         struct vring_used *used);

+int vringh_set_base_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, u16 idx);
+
 int vringh_getdesc_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh,
                         struct vringh_kiov *riov,
                         struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
--
2.39.3
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help