Re: [syzbot] WARNING in vhost_dev_cleanup (2)
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: 2022-02-17 09:48:35
Also in:
kvm, lkml, netdev
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:50 AM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:39:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 3:36 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:34:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:01 AM syzbot [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: c5d9ae265b10 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org.. git tree: upstream console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=132e687c700000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=a78b064590b9f912 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1e3ea63db39f2b4440e0 compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2 Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+1e3ea63db39f2b4440e0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10828 at drivers/vhost/vhost.c:715 vhost_dev_cleanup+0x8b8/0xbc0 drivers/vhost/vhost.c:715 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 10828 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc4-syzkaller-00051-gc5d9ae265b10 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:vhost_dev_cleanup+0x8b8/0xbc0 drivers/vhost/vhost.c:715Probably a hint that we are missing a flush. Looking at vhost_vsock_stop() that is called by vhost_vsock_dev_release(): static int vhost_vsock_stop(struct vhost_vsock *vsock) { size_t i; int ret; mutex_lock(&vsock->dev.mutex); ret = vhost_dev_check_owner(&vsock->dev); if (ret) goto err; Where it could fail so the device is not actually stopped. I wonder if this is something related. ThanksBut then if that is not the owner then no work should be running, right?Could it be a buggy user space that passes the fd to another process and changes the owner just before the mutex_lock() above? ThanksMaybe, but can you be a bit more explicit? what is the set of conditions you see that can lead to this?
I think the issue could be in the vhost_vsock_stop() as Jason mentioned, but not related to fd passing, but related to the do_exit() function. Looking the stack trace, we are in exit_task_work(), that is called after exit_mm(), so the vhost_dev_check_owner() can fail because current->mm should be NULL at that point. It seems the fput work is queued by fput_many() in a worker queue, and in some cases (maybe a lot of files opened?) the work is still queued when we enter in do_exit(). That said, I don't know if we can simply remove that check in vhost_vsock_stop(), or check if current->mm is NULL, to understand if the process is exiting. Stefano _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization