Re: [PATCH v2] fuse: rename some files and clean up Makefile
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-11-29 13:35:51
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:27:17PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
On 11/29/2021 06:19 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:quoted
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 06:13:22PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:quoted
No need to generate virtio_fs.o first and then link to virtiofs.o, just rename virtio_fs.c to virtiofs.c and remove "virtiofs-y := virtio_fs.o" in Makefile, also update MAINTAINERS. Additionally, rename the private header file fuse_i.h to fuse.h, like ext4.h in fs/ext4, xfs.h in fs/xfs and f2fs.h in fs/f2fs.There are two separate changes in this patch (virtio_fs.c -> virtiofs.c and fuse_i.h -> fuse.h). A patch series with two patches would be easier to review and cleaner to backport. I'm happy with renaming virtio_fs.c to virtiofs.c: Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>Hi Stefan and Miklos, Thanks for your reply, what should I do now? (1) split this patch into two separate patches to send v3; (2) just ignore this patch because "This will make backport of bugfixes harder for no good reason." said by Miklos.
I agree with Miklos that there does not seem to be a very strong reason to rename. It probably falls in the category of nice to have cleanup. But it will also make backports harder. So I also like the idea of not making this change. Vivek _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization