Re: Which tree for paravirt related patches?

Srivatsa,

On Thu, Nov 04 2021 at 12:09, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:

On a related note, I'll be stepping in soon to assist (in place of
Deep) as a co-maintainer of the PARAVIRT_OPS interface. I had the same
query about which tree would be best for patches to the paravirt-ops
code, so I'm glad to see that it got clarified on this thread.

Welcome to the club.

I'll also be taking over the maintainership of the VMware hypervisor
interface. Looking at the git logs, I believe those patches have
also been handled via the tip tree; so would it be okay to add the
x86 ML and the tip tree to the VMware hypervisor interface entry too
in the MAINTAINERS file?

We've routed them through tip, yes. So yes, that's fine to have a
separate entry in the maintainers file which has you and x86@kernel.org
plus the tip tree mentioned.

Thanks,

        tglx


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization