Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] fuse: Make DAX mount option a tri-state
From: JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2021-07-20 05:54:27
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On 7/20/21 2:02 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 06:47:51PM +0800, Jeffle Xu wrote:quoted
We add 'always', 'never', and 'inode' (default). '-o dax' continues to operate the same which is equivalent to 'always'. By the time this patch is applied, 'inode' mode is actually equal to 'always' mode, before the per-file DAX flag is introduced in the following patch. Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> --- fs/fuse/dax.c | 13 ++++++++++++- fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 11 +++++++++-- fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 +- fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/fuse/dax.c b/fs/fuse/dax.c index c6f4e82e65f3..a478e824c2d0 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/dax.c +++ b/fs/fuse/dax.c@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ struct fuse_inode_dax { }; struct fuse_conn_dax { + /** dax mode: FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_* (always, never or per-file) **/ + unsigned int mode;Why "/**" ?
I copied this comment style from fuse in v4.19... Anyway, I will fix this.
How about make it something like "enum fuse_dax_mode mode" instead? enum fuse_dax_mode dax_mode;
OK.
quoted
+ /* DAX device */ struct dax_device *dev;@@ -1288,7 +1291,8 @@ static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd) return ret; } -int fuse_dax_conn_alloc(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct dax_device *dax_dev) +int fuse_dax_conn_alloc(struct fuse_conn *fc, unsigned int mode, + struct dax_device *dax_dev) { struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd; int err;@@ -1301,6 +1305,7 @@ int fuse_dax_conn_alloc(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct dax_device *dax_dev) return -ENOMEM; spin_lock_init(&fcd->lock); + fcd->mode = mode; fcd->dev = dax_dev; err = fuse_dax_mem_range_init(fcd); if (err) {@@ -1339,10 +1344,16 @@ static const struct address_space_operations fuse_dax_file_aops = { static bool fuse_should_enable_dax(struct inode *inode) { struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode); + unsigned int mode; if (!fc->dax) return false; + mode = fc->dax->mode; + + if (mode == FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_NEVER) + return false; + return true; }diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h index 07829ce78695..f29018323845 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h@@ -487,6 +487,12 @@ struct fuse_dev { struct list_head entry; }; +enum {And this becomes. enum fuse_dax_mode { };
OK.
quoted
+ FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_INODE, + FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_ALWAYS, + FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_NEVER, +};How about getting rid of "MOUNT" and just do. FUSE_DAX_INODE, FUSE_DAX_ALWAYS, FUSE_DAX_NEVER,
OK.
quoted
+ struct fuse_fs_context { int fd; unsigned int rootmode;@@ -503,7 +509,7 @@ struct fuse_fs_context { bool no_control:1; bool no_force_umount:1; bool legacy_opts_show:1; - bool dax:1; + unsigned int dax;enum fuse_dax_mode dax_mode;
OK.
quoted
unsigned int max_read; unsigned int blksize; const char *subtype;@@ -1242,7 +1248,8 @@ ssize_t fuse_dax_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to); ssize_t fuse_dax_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from); int fuse_dax_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma); int fuse_dax_break_layouts(struct inode *inode, u64 dmap_start, u64 dmap_end); -int fuse_dax_conn_alloc(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct dax_device *dax_dev); +int fuse_dax_conn_alloc(struct fuse_conn *fc, unsigned int mode,^^ enum fuse_dax_mode dax_mode
OK.
quoted
+ struct dax_device *dax_dev); void fuse_dax_conn_free(struct fuse_conn *fc); bool fuse_dax_inode_alloc(struct super_block *sb, struct fuse_inode *fi); void fuse_dax_inode_init(struct inode *inode);diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c index b9beb39a4a18..f6b46395edb2 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c@@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ int fuse_fill_super_common(struct super_block *sb, struct fuse_fs_context *ctx) sb->s_subtype = ctx->subtype; ctx->subtype = NULL; if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_DAX)) { - err = fuse_dax_conn_alloc(fc, ctx->dax_dev); + err = fuse_dax_conn_alloc(fc, ctx->dax, ctx->dax_dev); if (err) goto err; }diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c index 8f52cdaa8445..561f711d1945 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c@@ -88,12 +88,21 @@ struct virtio_fs_req_work { static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq, struct fuse_req *req, bool in_flight); +static const struct constant_table dax_param_enums[] = { + {"inode", FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_INODE }, + {"always", FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_ALWAYS }, + {"never", FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_NEVER }, + {} +}; + enum { OPT_DAX, + OPT_DAX_ENUM, }; static const struct fs_parameter_spec virtio_fs_parameters[] = { fsparam_flag("dax", OPT_DAX), + fsparam_enum("dax", OPT_DAX_ENUM, dax_param_enums), {} };@@ -110,7 +119,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, switch (opt) { case OPT_DAX: - ctx->dax = 1; + ctx->dax = FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_ALWAYS; + break; + case OPT_DAX_ENUM: + ctx->dax = result.uint_32;Do we want to check here if result.uint_32 has one of the allowed values. FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_INODE, FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_ALWAYS or FUSE_DAX_MOUNT_NEVER. Or VFS has already taken care of that?
VFS will ensure that the returned result.uint_32 can only be among the values defined in 'struct constant_table', or fs_parse() will return -EINVAL. -- Thanks, Jeffle _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization