On 21 Jul 2021, at 11:00, Greg KH [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:46:15AM +0000, Jorgen Hansen wrote:

quoted

quoted

On 20 Jul 2021, at 12:39, Greg KH [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:29:01AM -0700, Jorgen Hansen wrote:

quoted

Add maintainer info for the VMware VMCI driver.

Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <redacted>
---
MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index a61f4f3..7e7c6fa 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS

@@ -19792,6 +19792,14 @@ L:	netdev@vger.kernel.org

S:	Supported
F:	drivers/ptp/ptp_vmw.c

+VMWARE VMCI DRIVER
+M:	Jorgen Hansen [off-list ref]
+M:	Vishnu Dasa [off-list ref]
+M:	"VMware, Inc." [off-list ref]

Please do not use generic aliases as they provide no personal
responsibility.  Just stick with real people.

That makes sense. However, the pv-drivers list is used for keeping managers
and people helping with testing in the loop. So would adding pv-drivers as a
second L: entry be OK?

Is it really a list?  If not, then that would not make much sense.

It is - with VMware subscribers only but anyone can post to it. If the intent of the
L: entries is to allow folks to subscribe to relevant information, then it isn’t
appropriate.

All existing vmw driver maintainer entries have pv-drivers as an M: entry,
so has there been a change in policy regarding this? The approach has
been quite useful for us.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization