Re: Security hole in vhost-vdpa?
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-06-06 21:38:26
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 02:39:48PM +0000, Gautam Dawar wrote:
Hi All, This is in continuation to my findings noted in Bug 213179 and discussions we have had in the last couple of weeks over emails. Today, I published the first patch for this issue which adds timeout based wait for completion event and also logs a warning message to alert the user/ administrator of the problem.
Can't close just finish without waiting for userspace? Then notify userspace about any buffers that did not complete ...
As a next step, the idea is to implement a mechanism to allow vhost-vdpa module notify userspace app (QEMU) to close the fd corresponding to the vhost-vdpa character device when it is waiting for the completion event in vhost_vdpa_remove(). Jason confirmed this by saying that we need a new eventfd/ ioctl to receive hot remove request from kernel. Although, we can proceed to implement changes for the part described above but I feel that that the problem is much deeper than that. This mechanism will just request the userspace to close the fd and let vhost-vdpa proceed with the clean-up. However, IMHO things should be under more control of kernel space than the user space. The problem I am trying to highlight is that a malicious user-space application can render any module registering a vDPA device to hang in their de-initialization sequence. This will typically surface when vdpa_device_unregister() is called from the function responsible for module unload leading rmmod commands to not return, forever. To prove my point, I created a simple C program (test_vdpa.c) that opens the vhost-vdpa character device and never exits. The logs (test_logs.txt) show that after registering the vDPA device from sfc driver, vhost-vdpa module creates the char device /dev/vhost-vdpa-0 for it. As this is available to all apps in the userspace, the malicious app (./block_vdpa_unload) opens this device and goes to infinite sleep. At this time, when module unload (rmmod sfc) is called, it hangs and the following print informs the user/admin of this state with following message: [ 8180.053647] vhost-vdpa-0: vhost_vdpa_remove waiting for /dev/vhost-vdpa-0 to be closed Finally, when block_vdpa_unload is killed, vhost_vdpa_remove() unblocks and sfc module is unloaded. With such application running in userspace, a kernel module (that registered corresponding vDPA device) will hang during unload sequence. Such control of the userspace application on the system resources should certainly be prevented. To me, this seems to be a serious issue and requires modifications in the way it is currently handled in vhost-vdpa (and other modules (VFIO?) with similar implementation). Let me know what you think. Regards, Gautam Dawar
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <errno.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
unsigned int index;
char dev_path[30];
int fd;
if (argc != 2) {
printf("Usage: %s <vhost-vdpa device index>\n", argv[0]);
return -1;
}
index = strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 10);
snprintf(dev_path, sizeof(dev_path), "/dev/vhost-vdpa-%u", index);
fd = open(dev_path, O_RDWR);
if(fd < 0)
{
printf("Failed to open %s, errno: %d!\n", dev_path, errno);
return 1;
}
printf("Blocking unload of driver that registered vDPA device"
" corresponding to cdev %s created by vhost-vdpa\n", dev_path);
while (1)
sleep(1);
close(fd);
return 0;
}[root@ndr730p ~]# ~/create_vdpa_device.sh [root@ndr730p ~]# ll /dev/vhost-vdpa-0 crw------- 1 root root 240, 0 Jun 6 19:59 /dev/vhost-vdpa-0 [root@ndr730p ~]# ./block_vdpa_unload 0 & [1] 10930 Blocking unload of driver that registered vDPA device corresponding to cdev /dev/vhost-vdpa-0 created by vhost-vdpa [root@ndr730p ~]# rmmod sfc [ 8179.010520] sfc_ef100 0000:06:00.4: ef100_vdpa_delete: Calling vdpa unregister device [ 8180.053647] vhost-vdpa-0: vhost_vdpa_remove waiting for /dev/vhost-vdpa-0 to be closed [root@ndr730p ~]# kill -9 10930 [ 8218.392897] sfc_ef100 0000:06:00.0: shutdown successful
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization