Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
From: Jie Deng <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-30 06:46:26
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
On 2021/6/29 18:07, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi, so some minor comments left:quoted
+ if (!msgs[i].len) + break;I hope this can extended in the future to allow zero-length messages. If this is impossible we need to set an adapter quirk instead.
Yes, we can support it by removing this check and call it zero-length request. It don't think it will break anything.
quoted
+ err = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, outcnt, incnt, &reqs[i], GFP_KERNEL); + if (err < 0) { + pr_err("failed to add msg[%d] to virtqueue.\n", i);Is it really helpful for the user to know that msg5 failed? We don't even say which transfer.
OK. I will remove this print.
quoted
+static u32 virtio_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap) +{ + return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;You are not emulating I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK, so you need to mask it out.
I will remove the check of zero-length message.
quoted
+ snprintf(vi->adap.name, sizeof(vi->adap.name), "Virtio I2C Adapter");Is there something to add so you can distinguish multiple instances? Most people want that.
I find the I2C core will set a device name "i2c-%d" for this purpose, right? I think this name can be used to distinguish the adapter types while "i2c-%d" can be used to distinguish instances. Does it make sense ?
quoted
+ vi->adap.class = I2C_CLASS_DEPRECATED; + vi->adap.algo = &virtio_algorithm; + vi->adap.dev.parent = &vdev->dev; + vi->adap.timeout = HZ / 10;Why so short? HZ is the kinda default value.
Ah... I didn't know the I2C core had already set a default value. I will remove this line to use the default one.
quoted
+ i2c_set_adapdata(&vi->adap, vi); + + /* Setup ACPI node for controlled devices which will be probed through ACPI */ + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&vi->adap.dev, ACPI_COMPANION(pdev)); + + ret = i2c_add_adapter(&vi->adap); + if (ret) { + virtio_i2c_del_vqs(vdev); + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to add virtio-i2c adapter.\n");Won't the driver core print that for us?
Yes. It seems unnecessary. Will remove it.
quoted
+ } + + return ret; +} + +/* The bit 0 of the @virtio_i2c_out_hdr.@flags, used to group the requests */ +#define VIRTIO_I2C_FLAGS_FAIL_NEXT 0x00000001BIT(0)?
That's better. Thank you.
Happy hacking,
Wolfram_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization