On 5/7/21 5:15 PM, Connor Kuehl wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Distribute requests across the multiqueue complex automatically based
on the IRQ affinity.
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <redacted>
---
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index bcb8a02e2d8b..dcdc8b7b1ad5 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@
static DEFINE_MUTEX(virtio_fs_mutex);
static LIST_HEAD(virtio_fs_instances);
+struct virtio_fs_vq;
+
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct virtio_fs_vq *, this_cpu_fsvq);
[..]
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
+ struct virtio_fs_vq **cpu_vq = per_cpu_ptr(&this_cpu_fsvq, cpu);
+ *cpu_vq = &fs->vqs[i];
+ }
+ }
Hmm, actually, it's just occurred to me that the per-CPU state could be
problematic with multiple virtio-fs mounts.
I'll workshop this some more.
Connor
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization