Re: [PATCH linux-next v2 4/7] vdpa: Define vdpa mgmt device, ops and a netlink interface
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-01-05 04:11:38
Also in:
netdev
On 2021/1/4 下午3:24, Parav Pandit wrote:
quoted
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:33 PM On 2021/1/4 上午11:31, Parav Pandit wrote:quoted
To add one or more VDPA devices, define a management device which allows adding or removing vdpa device. A management device defines set of callbacks to manage vdpa devices. To begin with, it defines add and remove callbacks through which a user defined vdpa device can be added or removed. A unique management device is identified by its unique handle identified by management device name and optionally the bus name. Hence, introduce routine through which driver can register a management device and its callback operations for adding and remove a vdpa device. Introduce vdpa netlink socket family so that user can query management device and its attributes. Example of show vdpa management device which allows creating vdpa device of networking class (device id = 0x1) of virtio specification 1.1 section 5.1.1. $ vdpa mgmtdev show vdpasim_net: supported_classes: net Example of showing vdpa management device in JSON format. $ vdpa mgmtdev show -jp { "show": { "vdpasim_net": { "supported_classes": [ "net" ] } } } Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit<redacted> Reviewed-by: Eli Cohen<redacted> Reviewed-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com> --- Changelog: v1->v2: - rebased - updated commit log example for management device name from "vdpasim" to "vdpasim_net" - removed device_id as net and block management devices are separatedSo I wonder whether there could be a type of management devices that can deal with multiple types of virtio devices. If yes, we probably need to add device id back.At this point mlx5 plan to support only net. It is useful to see what type of vdpa device is supported by a management device. In future if a mgmt dev supports multiple types, user needs to choose desired type. I guess we can differ this optional type to future, when such mgmt. device will/may be available.
I worry if we remove device_id, it may gives a hint that multiple mgmt devices needs to be registered if it supports multiple types. So if possible I would like to keep the device_id here. Thanks _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization