Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] x86: rework arch_local_irq_restore() to not use popf
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2020-12-09 14:03:38
Also in:
lkml, xen-devel
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 01:27:10PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 01:44:53PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:quoted
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 10:55 PM Jürgen Groß [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 20.11.20 12:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
If someone were to write horrible code like: local_irq_disable(); local_irq_save(flags); local_irq_enable(); local_irq_restore(flags); we'd be up some creek without a paddle... now I don't _think_ we have genius code like that, but I'd feel saver if we can haz an assertion in there somewhere...
I was just talking to Peter on IRC about implementing the same thing for
arm64, so could we put this in the generic irqflags code? IIUC we can
use raw_irqs_disabled() to do the check.
As this isn't really entry specific (and IIUC the cases this should
catch would break lockdep today), maybe we should add a new
DEBUG_IRQFLAGS for this, that DEBUG_LOCKDEP can also select?
Something like:
#define local_irq_restore(flags) \
do { \
if (!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) { \
trace_hardirqs_on(); \
} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_IRQFLAGS) { \
if (unlikely(raw_irqs_disabled()) \Whoops; that should be !raw_irqs_disabled().
warn_bogus_irqrestore(); \
} \
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
} while (0)
... perhaps? (ignoring however we deal with once-ness).If no-one shouts in the next day or two I'll spin this as its own patch. Mark. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization