Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost-vdpa: fix page pinning leakage in error path (rework)
From: si-wei liu <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-05 22:40:23
Also in:
lkml
On 11/4/2020 7:12 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2020/11/5 上午7:40, si-wei liu wrote:quoted
On 11/3/2020 6:42 PM, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On 2020/10/30 下午3:45, Si-Wei Liu wrote:quoted
Pinned pages are not properly accounted particularly when mapping error occurs on IOTLB update. Clean up dangling pinned pages for the error path. The memory usage for bookkeeping pinned pages is reverted to what it was before: only one single free page is needed. This helps reduce the host memory demand for VM with a large amount of memory, or in the situation where host is running short of free memory. Fixes: 4c8cf31885f6 ("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend") Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <redacted> --- drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c index b6d9016..8da8558 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c@@ -560,6 +560,8 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v, if (r) vhost_iotlb_del_range(dev->iotlb, iova, iova + size - 1); + else + atomic64_add(size >> PAGE_SHIFT, &dev->mm->pinned_vm); return r; }@@ -591,14 +593,16 @@ static intvhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned long list_size = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page *); unsigned int gup_flags = FOLL_LONGTERM; unsigned long npages, cur_base, map_pfn, last_pfn = 0; - unsigned long locked, lock_limit, pinned, i; + unsigned long lock_limit, sz2pin, nchunks, i; u64 iova = msg->iova; + long pinned; int ret = 0; if (vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, msg->iova, msg->iova + msg->size - 1)) return -EEXIST; + /* Limit the use of memory for bookkeeping */ page_list = (struct page **) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL); if (!page_list) return -ENOMEM;@@ -607,52 +611,64 @@ static intvhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v, gup_flags |= FOLL_WRITE; npages = PAGE_ALIGN(msg->size + (iova & ~PAGE_MASK)) >> PAGE_SHIFT; - if (!npages) - return -EINVAL; + if (!npages) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto free; + } mmap_read_lock(dev->mm); - locked = atomic64_add_return(npages, &dev->mm->pinned_vm); lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT; - - if (locked > lock_limit) { + if (npages + atomic64_read(&dev->mm->pinned_vm) > lock_limit) { ret = -ENOMEM; - goto out; + goto unlock; } cur_base = msg->uaddr & PAGE_MASK; iova &= PAGE_MASK; + nchunks = 0; while (npages) { - pinned = min_t(unsigned long, npages, list_size); - ret = pin_user_pages(cur_base, pinned, - gup_flags, page_list, NULL); - if (ret != pinned) + sz2pin = min_t(unsigned long, npages, list_size); + pinned = pin_user_pages(cur_base, sz2pin, + gup_flags, page_list, NULL); + if (sz2pin != pinned) { + if (pinned < 0) { + ret = pinned; + } else { + unpin_user_pages(page_list, pinned); + ret = -ENOMEM; + } goto out; + } + nchunks++; if (!last_pfn) map_pfn = page_to_pfn(page_list[0]); - for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < pinned; i++) { unsigned long this_pfn = page_to_pfn(page_list[i]); u64 csize; if (last_pfn && (this_pfn != last_pfn + 1)) { /* Pin a contiguous chunk of memory */ csize = (last_pfn - map_pfn + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT; - if (vhost_vdpa_map(v, iova, csize, - map_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, - msg->perm)) + ret = vhost_vdpa_map(v, iova, csize, + map_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, + msg->perm); + if (ret) goto out; + map_pfn = this_pfn; iova += csize; + nchunks = 0; } last_pfn = this_pfn; } - cur_base += ret << PAGE_SHIFT; - npages -= ret; + cur_base += pinned << PAGE_SHIFT; + npages -= pinned; } /* Pin the rest chunk */@@ -660,10 +676,22 @@ static intvhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v, map_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, msg->perm); out: if (ret) { + if (nchunks && last_pfn) {Can we decrease npages where you did "nchunks++" then we can check npages here instead?Hmmm, I am not sure I get what you want... @nchunks gets reset to 0 whenever a certain range of pinned pages is successfully mapped. The conditional (when nchunks is non-zero) here indicates if there's any _outstanding_ pinned page that has to clean up in the error handling path. While the decrement of @npages may not occur when resetting the @nchunks counter, rendering incorrect cleanup in the error path.Yes, I meant e can decrease npages where you did "nchunks++". Anyhow, it's just a optimization to avoid a local variable which is not a must.
To me that opportunity doesn't exist. @nchunks and @npages track different kind of things. @npages is not interchangeable to represent all possible error cases. -Siwei
quoted
BTW while reviewing it I got noticed of an error in my code. There might be still page pinning leak from wherever the vhost_vdpa_map() error occurs towards the end of page_list. I will post a v2 to fix this.Sure, will review. Thanksquoted
Regards, -Siwei--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c@@ -656,8 +656,19 @@ static intvhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v, ret = vhost_vdpa_map(v, iova, csize, map_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, msg->perm); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + /* + * Unpin the pages that are left unmapped + * from this point on in the current + * page_list. The remaining outstanding + * ones which may stride across several + * chunks will be covered in the common + * error path subsequently. + */ + unpin_user_pages(&page_list[i], + pinned - i); goto out; + } map_pfn = this_pfn; iova += csize;quoted
Thanksquoted
+ unsigned long pfn; + + /* + * Unpin the outstanding pages which are unmapped. + * Mapped pages are accounted in vdpa_map(), thus + * will be handled by vdpa_unmap(). + */ + for (pfn = map_pfn; pfn <= last_pfn; pfn++) + unpin_user_page(pfn_to_page(pfn)); + } vhost_vdpa_unmap(v, msg->iova, msg->size); - atomic64_sub(npages, &dev->mm->pinned_vm); } +unlock: mmap_read_unlock(dev->mm); +free: free_page((unsigned long)page_list); return ret; }
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization