On 8/10/20 12:39 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:

On 09.08.20 04:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:

quoted

On 8/7/20 4:38 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:

quoted

@@ -377,10 +373,7 @@ static inline pte_t __pte(pteval_t val)

  {
      pteval_t ret;
  -    if (sizeof(pteval_t) > sizeof(long))
-        ret = PVOP_CALLEE2(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val, (u64)val >>
32);
-    else
-        ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val);
+    ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val);
        return (pte_t) { .pte = ret };

Can this now simply return (pte_t) ret?

I don't think so, but I can turn it into

  return native_make_pte(PVOP_CALLEE1(...)); 

I thought that since now this is only built for 64-bit we don't have to
worry about different pte_t definitions and can do what we do for
example, for __pgd()?


-boris


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization