Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 4 authors, 2020-07-23

Re: [PATCH 09/10] block: scsi: sd: use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size

From: Damien Le Moal <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-21 11:25:17
Also in: linux-block, linux-mmc, linux-scsi, lkml

On 2020/07/21 19:55, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size instead of hardcoded list
s/hardcoded list/hardcoded checks./
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <redacted>
---
 drivers/scsi/sd.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index d90fefffe31b7..f012e7397b058 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2520,10 +2520,7 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
 			  "assuming 512.\n");
 	}
 
-	if (sector_size != 512 &&
-	    sector_size != 1024 &&
-	    sector_size != 2048 &&
-	    sector_size != 4096) {
+	if (!blk_is_valid_logical_block_size(sector_size)) {
 		sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Unsupported sector size %d.\n",
 			  sector_size);
 		/*
With the commit message fixed, looks OK.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <redacted>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help