On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:39:26AM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:

quoted

quoted

How about playing with the batch size? Make it a mod parameter instead
of the hard coded 64, and measure for all values 1 to 64 ...

Right, according to the test result, 64 seems to be too aggressive in
the case of TX.

Got it, thanks both!

In particular I wonder whether with batch size 1
we get same performance as without batching
(would indicate 64 is too aggressive)
or not (would indicate one of the code changes
affects performance in an unexpected way).

-- 
MST