Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-07-06 14:34:21
Also in:
kvm, linux-s390, lkml
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:37:37 +0200 Pierre Morel [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2020-07-02 15:03, Pierre Morel wrote:quoted
On 2020-06-29 18:05, Cornelia Huck wrote:quoted
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:57:14 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:43:57PM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:quoted
An architecture protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host access may want to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the use of VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM. Let's give a chance to the architecture to accept or not devices without VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM. Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <redacted> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <redacted> --- arch/s390/mm/init.c | 6 ++++++ drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/virtio.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)quoted
quoted
@@ -179,6 +194,13 @@ int virtio_finalize_features(structvirtio_device *dev) if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) return 0; + if (arch_needs_virtio_iommu_platform(dev) && + !virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) { + dev_warn(&dev->dev, + "virtio: device must provide VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK); status = dev->config->get_status(dev); if (!(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK)) {Well don't you need to check it *before* VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1, not after?But it's only available with VERSION_1 anyway, isn't it? So it probably also needs to fail when this feature is needed if VERSION_1 has not been negotiated, I think.would be something like: - if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) - return 0; + if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) { + ret = arch_accept_virtio_features(dev); + if (ret) + dev_warn(&dev->dev, + "virtio: device must provide VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1\n"); + return ret; + }
That looks wrong; I think we want to validate in all cases. What about:
ret = arch_accept_virtio_features(dev); // this can include checking for
// older or newer features
if (ret)
// assume that the arch callback moaned already
return ret;
if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
return 0;
// do the virtio-1 only FEATURES_OK dance
just a thought on the function name: It becomes more general than just IOMMU_PLATFORM related. What do you think of: arch_accept_virtio_features()
Or maybe arch_validate_virtio_features()?
? Regards, Pierre