Re: [PATCH RFC v7 03/14] vhost: use batched get_vq_desc version
From: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-06-15 16:06:01
Also in:
kvm, lkml, netdev
Subsystem:
the rest, virtio host (vhost) · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, "Michael S. Tsirkin", Jason Wang
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 07:30 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 06:18:32PM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 5:13 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 02:37:50PM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:quoted
quoted
+/* This function returns a value > 0 if a descriptor was found, or 0 if none were found. + * A negative code is returned on error. */ +static int fetch_descs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) +{ + int ret; + + if (unlikely(vq->first_desc >= vq->ndescs)) { + vq->first_desc = 0; + vq->ndescs = 0; + } + + if (vq->ndescs) + return 1; + + for (ret = 1; + ret > 0 && vq->ndescs <= vhost_vq_num_batch_descs(vq); + ret = fetch_buf(vq)) + ;(Expanding comment in V6): We get an infinite loop this way: * vq->ndescs == 0, so we call fetch_buf() here * fetch_buf gets less than vhost_vq_num_batch_descs(vq); descriptors. ret = 1 * This loop calls again fetch_buf, but vq->ndescs > 0 (and avail_vq == last_avail_vq), so it just return 1That's what [PATCH RFC v7 08/14] fixup! vhost: use batched get_vq_desc version is supposed to fix.Sorry, I forgot to include that fixup. With it I don't see CPU stalls, but with that version latency has increased a lot and I see packet lost: + ping -c 5 10.200.0.1 PING 10.200.0.1 (10.200.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.quoted
From 10.200.0.2 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.200.0.2 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.200.0.2 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable64 bytes from 10.200.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=6848 ms--- 10.200.0.1 ping statistics ---5 packets transmitted, 1 received, +3 errors, 80% packet loss, time 76ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6848.316/6848.316/6848.316/0.000 ms, pipe 4 -- I cannot even use netperf.OK so that's the bug to try to find and fix I think.quoted
If I modify with my proposed version: + ping -c 5 10.200.0.1 PING 10.200.0.1 (10.200.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.200.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=7.07 ms 64 bytes from 10.200.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.358 ms 64 bytes from 10.200.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=5.35 ms 64 bytes from 10.200.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.27 ms 64 bytes from 10.200.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.426 msNot sure which version this is.quoted
[root@localhost ~]# netperf -H 10.200.0.1 -p 12865 -l 10 -t TCP_STREAM MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.200.0.1 () port 0 AF_INET Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 131072 16384 16384 10.01 4742.36 [root@localhost ~]# netperf -H 10.200.0.1 -p 12865 -l 10 -t UDP_STREAM MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.200.0.1 () port 0 AF_INET Socket Message Elapsed Messages Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec 212992 65507 10.00 9214 0 482.83 212992 10.00 9214 482.83 I will compare with the non-batch version for reference, but the difference between the two is noticeable. Maybe it's worth finding a good value for the if() inside fetch_buf? Thanks!I don't think it's performance, I think it's a bug somewhere, e.g. maybe we corrupt a packet, or stall the queue, or something like this. Let's do this, I will squash the fixups and post v8 so you can bisect and then debug cleanly.
Ok, so if we apply the patch proposed in v7 08/14 (Or the version 8 of the patchset sent), this is what happens: 1. Userland (virtio_test in my case) introduces just one buffer in vq, and it kicks 2. vhost module reaches fetch_descs, called from vhost_get_vq_desc. From there we call fetch_buf in a for loop. 3. The first time we call fetch_buf, it returns properly one buffer. However, the second time we call it, it returns 0 because vq->avail_idx == vq->last_avail_idx and vq->avail_idx == last_avail_idx code path. 4. fetch_descs assign ret = 0, so it returns 0. vhost_get_vq_desc will goto err, and it will signal no new buffer (returning vq->num). So to fix it and maintain the batching maybe we could return vq->ndescs in case ret == 0:
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index c0dfb5e3d2af..5993d4f34ca9 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c@@ -2315,7 +2327,8 @@ static int fetch_descs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) /* On success we expect some descs */ BUG_ON(ret > 0 && !vq->ndescs); - return ret; + return ret ?: vq->ndescs; } /* Reverse the effects of fetch_descs */ --
Another possibility could be to return different codes from fetch_buf, but I find the suggested modification easier. What do you think? Thanks!