On 2020/6/5 22:10, Sasha Levin wrote:

<20200123101000.GB24255@Red>
References: [ref]
<20200123101000.GB24255@Red>

Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: dbaf0624ffa5 ("crypto: add virtio-crypto driver").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.6.15, v5.4.43, v4.19.125, v4.14.182.

v5.6.15: Build OK!
v5.4.43: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    eee1d6fca0a0 ("crypto: virtio - switch to skcipher API")

v4.19.125: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    eee1d6fca0a0 ("crypto: virtio - switch to skcipher API")

v4.14.182: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    500e6807ce93 ("crypto: virtio - implement missing support for output IVs")
    67189375bb3a ("crypto: virtio - convert to new crypto engine API")
    d0d859bb87ac ("crypto: virtio - Register an algo only if it's supported")
    e02b8b43f55a ("crypto: virtio - pr_err() strings should end with newlines")
    eee1d6fca0a0 ("crypto: virtio - switch to skcipher API")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

I've tried to adapt my patch to these stable tree, but it seems there're some
other bugs. so I think the best way to resolve these conflicts is to apply the
dependent patches detected.

If we apply these dependent patches, then the conflicts of other two patches:
 crypto: virtio: Fix use-after-free in virtio_crypto_skcipher_finalize_req
 crypto: virtio: Fix dest length calculation in __virtio_crypto_skcipher_do_req
will also be gone.

---
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)