Re: [PATCH 5/6] vdpa: introduce virtio pci driver
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-06-09 05:55:39
Also in:
kvm, lkml, netdev
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-06-09 05:55:39
Also in:
kvm, lkml, netdev
On 2020/6/8 下午9:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 06:07:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On 2020/6/8 下午5:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 05:46:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On 2020/6/8 下午5:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 05:43:58PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
Looking at pci_match_one_device() it checks both subvendor and subdevice there. ThanksBut IIUC there is no guarantee that driver with a specific subvendor matches in presence of a generic one. So either IFC or virtio pci can win, whichever binds first.I'm not sure I get there. But I try manually bind IFCVF to qemu's virtio-net-pci, and it fails. ThanksRight but the reverse can happen: virtio-net can bind to IFCVF first.That's kind of expected. The PF is expected to be bound to virtio-pci to create VF via sysfs. ThanksOnce VFs are created, don't we want IFCVF to bind rather than virtio-pci?Yes, but for PF we need virtio-pci. Thanks(Ab)using the driver_data field for this is an option. What do you think?
Maybe you can elaborate more on this idea? Thanks