Re: [PATCH v1 07/11] virtio-mem: Allow to offline partially unplugged memory blocks
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-10 11:46:27
Also in:
kvm, linux-mm, lkml
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-10 11:46:27
Also in:
kvm, linux-mm, lkml
On 10.03.20 12:43, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 02-03-20 14:49:37, David Hildenbrand wrote: [...]quoted
+static void virtio_mem_notify_going_offline(struct virtio_mem *vm, + unsigned long mb_id) +{ + const unsigned long nr_pages = PFN_DOWN(vm->subblock_size); + unsigned long pfn; + int sb_id, i; + + for (sb_id = 0; sb_id < vm->nb_sb_per_mb; sb_id++) { + if (virtio_mem_mb_test_sb_plugged(vm, mb_id, sb_id, 1)) + continue; + /* + * Drop our reference to the pages so the memory can get + * offlined and add the unplugged pages to the managed + * page counters (so offlining code can correctly subtract + * them again). + */ + pfn = PFN_DOWN(virtio_mem_mb_id_to_phys(mb_id) + + sb_id * vm->subblock_size); + adjust_managed_page_count(pfn_to_page(pfn), nr_pages); + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) + page_ref_dec(pfn_to_page(pfn + i));Is there ever situation this might be a different than 1->0 transition?
Only if some other code would be taking a reference. At least not from virtio-mem perspective. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb