Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] virtio-balloon: Switch back to OOM handler for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-14 14:19:10
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
quoted
There was a report that this results in undesired side effects when inflating the balloon to shrink the page cache. [1] "When inflating the balloon against page cache (i.e. no free memory remains) vmscan.c will both shrink page cache, but also invoke the shrinkers -- including the balloon's shrinker. So the balloon driver allocates memory which requires reclaim, vmscan gets this memory by shrinking the balloon, and then the driver adds the memory back to the balloon. Basically a busy no-op." The name "deflate on OOM" makes it pretty clear when deflation should happen - after other approaches to reclaim memory failed, not while reclaiming. This allows to minimize the footprint of a guest - memory will only be taken out of the balloon when really needed. Especially, a drop_slab() will result in the whole balloon getting deflated - undesired.Could you explain why some more? drop_caches shouldn't be really used in any production workloads and if somebody really wants all the cache to be dropped then why is balloon any different?
Deflation should happen when the guest is out of memory, not when somebody thinks it's time to reclaim some memory. That's what the feature promised from the beginning: Only give the guest more memory in case it *really* needs more memory. Deflate on oom, not deflate on reclaim/memory pressure. (that's what the report was all about) A priority for shrinkers might be a step into the right direction. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb