Re: [PATCH 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-01-20 21:49:11
Also in:
kvm, lkml, netdev
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-01-20 21:49:11
Also in:
kvm, lkml, netdev
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:49:39PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 04:43:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
This is similar to the design of platform IOMMU part of vhost-vdpa. We decide to send diffs to platform IOMMU there. If it's ok to do that in driver, we can replace set_map with incremental API like map()/unmap(). Then driver need to maintain rbtree itself.I think we really need to see two modes, one where there is a fixed translation without dynamic vIOMMU driven changes and one that supports vIOMMU. There are different optimization goals in the drivers for these two configurations.quoted
quoted
If the first one, then I think memory hotplug is a heavy flow regardless. Do you think the extra cycles for the tree traverse will be visible in any way?I think if the driver can pause the DMA during the time for setting up new mapping, it should be fine.This is very tricky for any driver if the mapping change hits the virtio rings. :( Even a IOMMU using driver is going to have problems with that.. Jason
I think for starters we can assume this doesn't happen, so any change doesn't affect any buffers in use. Certainly true e.g. for memory hotplug. -- MST