Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2018-08-01

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] virtio-net: get rid of unnecessary container of rq stats

flat view

From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-01 01:39:16
Also in: lkml, netdev


On 2018年07月31日 18:02, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
On 2018/07/31 18:43, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
We don't maintain tx counters in rx stats any more. There's no need
for an extra container of rq stats.

Cc: Toshiaki Makita <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
---
  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 72d3f68..14f661c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ struct virtnet_sq_stats {
  	u64 kicks;
  };
  
-struct virtnet_rq_stat_items {
+struct virtnet_rq_stats {
+	struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
  	u64 packets;
  	u64 bytes;
  	u64 drops;
@@ -98,17 +99,8 @@ struct virtnet_rq_stat_items {
  	u64 kicks;
  };
  
-struct virtnet_rq_stats {
-	struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
-	struct virtnet_rq_stat_items items;
-};
I'm not thinking removing sq stat is needed but even if it is I want to
keep virtnet_rq_stats to avoid allocating unnecessary u64_stats_syncp on
stack in virtnet_receive. I would just remove virtnet_rx_stats if necessary.
It's a nop on 64bit machines. And an unsigned on 32bit. So it's overhead could be ignored I think.

Thanks
quoted
-
-struct virtnet_rx_stats {
-	struct virtnet_rq_stat_items rx;
-};
-
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help