quoted hunk
quoted
quoted
On 10.08.18 at 13:52, [off-list ref] wrote:
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
@@ -228,9 +228,9 @@ void hyperv_setup_mmu_ops(void)
if (!(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_X64_EX_PROCESSOR_MASKS_RECOMMENDED)) {
pr_info("Using hypercall for remote TLB flush\n");
- pv_mmu_ops.flush_tlb_others = hyperv_flush_tlb_others;
+ pv_ops.pv_mmu_ops.flush_tlb_others = hyperv_flush_tlb_others;
Taking just this as example, why not
pv_ops.mmu.flush_tlb_others = hyperv_flush_tlb_others;
? Both pv_ and _ops are redundant on the field names.
Jan