* Nick Desaulniers [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 5:17 PM H. Peter Anvin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 06/14/18 13:59, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:48 PM H. Peter Anvin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 06/13/18 14:05, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
quoted
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <redacted>
i386 and x86-64 uses different registers for arguments; make them
available so we don't have to #ifdef in the actual code.
Native size and specified size (q, l, w, b) versions are provided.
Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek <redacted>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
I still object to Suggested-by: here. Sedat did a correction, which is
a Reviewed-by:, but unless I'm completely out to sea, there was no
suggestion on Sedat's part of this; and I had certainly not seen it when
I wrote the code.
I'm fine with changing it from a Suggested-by to a Reviewed-by. Can
you do that when you apply the set, or should I send a v6?
I'm not handling patch mechanics for x86 at the moment.
Hi Ingo and Thomas,
Have you had a chance to review this patch series for application?
Note that Juergen (the paravirt maintainer) acked the series:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37880
The only issue being swapping a Suggested-by for a Reviewed-by tag for
one commit, as above.
Could you please update the series with all suggestions and tags and send a new
series?
Thanks,
Ingo