Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-12-05

Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/21] drivers/vhost: Remove now-redundant read_barrier_depends()

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2017-12-05 21:17:35

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:28:38PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:57:52PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 09:51:48PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
WRITE_ONCE(obj->val, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(*foo, obj);
I believe Peter was instead suggesting:

WRITE_ONCE(obj->val, 1);
smp_store_release(foo, obj);
Isn't that more expensive though?
Depends on the architecture. The only architecture where it is more
expensive and people actually still care about is ARM I think.
Right. Why should I use the more expensive smp_store_release then?
Because it makes more sense. Memory ordering is hard enough, don't make
it harder still if you don't have to.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help