Re: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v3
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-09-12 16:20:00
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
This is an update from v2 version. Changes: - update event suppression mechanism - add wrap counter: DESC_WRAP flag in addition to DESC_DRIVER flag used for validity so device does not have to write out all used descriptors. - more options especially helpful for hardware implementations - in-order processing option due to popular demand - list of TODO items to consider as a follow-up, only two are open questions we need to descide now, marked as blocker, others are future enhancement ideas.
Perhaps this would make a good topic for a BoF session at the upcoming netdev. A new ring structure can be useful elsewhere, too, such as for af_packet v4.
--- Performance analysis of this is in my kvm forum 2016 presentation. The idea is to have a r/w descriptor in a ring structure, replacing the used and available ring, index and descriptor buffer. Note: the following mode of operation will actually work without changes when descriptor rings do not overlap, with driver writing out available entries in a read-only driver descriptor ring, device writing used entries in a write-only device descriptor ring.
The ring is always read-write, as the consumer has to toggle the DESC_DRIVER flag, right? Which mode are you referring to?
TODO: does this have any value for some? E.g. as a security feature? * Descriptor ring: Driver writes descriptors with unique index values and DESC_DRIVER set in flags. Descriptors are written in a ring order: from start to end of ring, wrapping around to the beginning. Device writes used descriptors with correct len, index, and DESC_HW clear. Again descriptors are written in ring order. This might not be the same order of driver descriptors, and not all descriptors have to be written out.
Virtio rings are used in both directions between guest device driver and host device, as well as in increasingly many situations outside vm i/o. I suggest using producer and consumer instead of driver and device when describing ring operations. When working on the virtio-net tx path, having to invert all the documentation in my head, because it is written from an rx point of view was a bit tricky ;-) I would then also convert DESC_DRIVER to DESC_VALID or so.
Driver and device are expected to maintain (internally) a wrap-around bit, starting at 0 and changing value each time they start writing out descriptors at the beginning of the ring. This bit is passed as DESC_WRAP bit in the flags field.
So, the flag effectively doubles the namespace of the id from 16 bit to 17 bit? Instead, how about using a larger identifier. Such as 32 bit. This also future proofs the design for cases where the ring may grow to exceed 65536 entries. Doing so is not a short term change, but it ould avoid the need for indirect descriptors and give greated room for out of order acknowledgement.
Flags are always set/cleared last. Note that driver can write descriptors out in any order, but device will not execute descriptor X+1 until descriptor X has been read as valid.
Why this constraint on the ring?
Driver operation: Driver makes descriptors available to device by writing out descriptors in the descriptor ring. Once ring is full, driver waits for device to use some descriptors before making more available. Descriptors can be used by device in any order, but must be read from ring in-order, and must be read completely before starting use. Thus, once a descriptor is used, driver can over-write both this descriptor and any descriptors which preceded it in the ring.
Does this mean that completing a descriptor by the consumer implicitly completes all descriptors that precede it in the ring?
Driver can detect use of descriptor either by device specific means (e.g. detect a buffer data change by device) or in a generic way by detecting that a used buffer has been written out by device.
I don't quite follow this.
Driver writes out available scatter/gather descriptor entries in guest
descriptor format:
#define DESC_WRAP 0x0040
#define DESC_DRIVER 0x0080
struct desc {
__le64 addr;
__le32 len;
__le16 index;
__le16 flags;
};
Fields:
addr - physical address of a s/g entry
len - length of an entryIs this ever larger than 16-bit? If not, then reducing to 16-bit allows growing index to 32-bit.
index - unique index. The low $\lceil log(N) \rceil - 1$
bits of the index is a driver-supplied value which can have any value
(under driver control). The high bits are reserved and should be
set to 0.
flags - descriptor flags.
Descriptors written by driver have DESC_DRIVER set.
Writing out this field makes the descriptor available for the device to use,
so all other fields must be valid when it is written.
DESC_WRAP - device uses this field to detect descriptor change by driver.
Driver can use 1 bit to set direction
/* This marks a descriptor as write-only (otherwise read-only). */
#define VRING_DESC_F_WRITE 2This is a per-ring flag, as opposed to the per-descriptor flags DESC_*. Please make that explicit and state in which structure it is set.
Device operation (using descriptors): Device is looking for descriptors in ring order. After detecting that the flags value has changed with DESC_DRIVER set and DESC_WRAP matching the wrap-around counter, it can start using the descriptors. Descriptors can be used in any order, but must be read from ring in-order. In other words device must not read descriptor X after it started using descriptor X+1.
Why? This is the same question as above, really. This seems like a device constraint, not necessarily a constraint to impose on the ring format.
Further, all buffer descriptors must be read completely before device starts using the buffer. This because once a descriptor is used, driver can over-write both this descriptor and any preceeding descriptors in ring.
This does explain the above constraint. I guess that I just do not understand the reason for this behavior.
To help driver detect use of descriptors and to pass extra meta-data
to driver, device writes out used entries in device descriptor format:
#define DESC_WRAP 0x0040
#define DESC_DRIVER 0x0080
struct desc {
__le64 reserved;
__le32 len;
__le16 index;
__le16 flags;
};
Fields:
reserved - can be any value, ignored by driver
len - length written by device. only valid if VRING_DESC_F_WRITE is set
len bytes of data from beginning of buffer are assumed to have been updated
index - unique index copied from the driver descriptor that has been used.
flags - descriptor flags.
Descriptors written by device have DESC_DRIVER clear.
Writing out this field notifies the driver that it can re-use the
descriptor id. It is also a signal that driver can over-write the
relevant descriptor (with the supplied id), and any other
DESC_WRAP - driver uses this field to detect descriptor change by device.
If device has used a buffer containing a write descriptor, it sets this bit:
#define VRING_DESC_F_WRITE 2
* Driver scatter/gather support
Driver can use 1 bit to chain s/g entries in a request, similar to virtio 1.0:
/* This marks a buffer as continuing in the next ring entry. */
#define VRING_DESC_F_NEXT 1Isn't this a descriptor flag, so DESC_NEXT?
When driver descriptors are chained in this way, multiple descriptors are treated as a part of a single transaction containing an optional write buffer followed by an optional read buffer.
Can you elaborate on the last part about optional write and read buffer?
All descriptors in the chain must have the same ID.
If so, then the explicit flag is not needed?
Unlike virtio 1.0, use of this flag will be an optional feature so both devices and drivers can opt out of it. If they do, they can either negotiate indirect descriptors or use single-descriptor entries exclusively for buffers. Device might detect a partial descriptor chain (VRING_DESC_F_NEXT set but next descriptor not valid).
This can be forbidden, by requiring the producer to set the DESC_DRIVER bit on the first descriptor only after the entire chain has been written. Do chains have to consist of consecutive descriptors?
In that case it must not use any parts of the chain - it will later be completed by driver, but device is allowed to store the valid parts of the chain as driver is not allowed to change them anymore. Two options are available: Device can write out the same number of descriptors for the chain, setting VRING_DESC_F_NEXT for all but the last descriptor. Driver will ignore all used descriptors with VRING_DESC_F_NEXT bit set. Device only writes out a single descriptor for the whole chain. However, to keep device and driver in sync, it then skips a number of descriptors corresponding to the length of the chain before writing out the next used descriptor. After detecting a used descriptor driver must find out the length of the chain that it built in order to know where to look for the next device descriptor. * Indirect buffers Indirect buffer descriptors is an optional feature. These are always written by driver, not the device. Indirect buffers have a special flag bit set - like in virtio 1.0: /* This means the buffer contains a table of buffer descriptors. */ #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT 4 VRING_DESC_F_WRITE and VRING_DESC_F_NEXT are always clear. len specifies the length of the indirect descriptor buffer in bytes and must be a multiple of 16.
Multiple of sizeof(struct indirect_desc). Also, struct indirect_desc is identical to struct desc. No need for a separate struct definition?
Unlike virtio 1.0, the buffer pointed to is a table, not a list:
This is just a linear array, right?
struct indirect_descriptor_table {
/* The actual descriptors (16 bytes each) */
struct indirect_desc desc[len / 16];
};
The first descriptor is located at start of the indirect descriptor
table, additional indirect descriptors come immediately afterwards.
struct indirect_desc {
__le64 addr;
__le32 len;
__le16 reserved;
__le16 flags;
};
DESC_F_WRITE is the only valid flag for descriptors in the indirect
table. Others should be set to 0 and are ignored. reserved field is
also set to 0 and should be ignored.
TODO (blocker): virtio 1.0 allows a s/g entry followed by
an indirect descriptor. Is this useful?Sounds like unnecessary complexity.
This support would be an optional feature, same as in virtio 1.0
* Batching descriptors:
virtio 1.0 allows passing a batch of descriptors in both directions, by
incrementing the used/avail index by values > 1.
At the moment only batching of used descriptors is used.
We can support this by chaining a list of device descriptors through
VRING_DESC_F_MORE flag. Device sets this bit to signal
driver that this is part of a batch of used descriptors
which are all part of a single transaction.
Driver might detect a partial descriptor chain (VRING_DESC_F_MORE
set but next descriptor not valid). In that case it must not
use any parts of the chain - it will later be completed by device,
but driver is allowed to store the valid parts of the chain as
device is not allowed to change them anymore.
Descriptor should not have both VRING_DESC_F_MORE and
VRING_DESC_F_NEXT set.
* Using descriptors in order
Some devices can guarantee that descriptors are used in
the order in which they were made available.
This allows driver optimizations and can be negotiated through
a feature bit.
* Per ring flags
It is useful to support features for some rings but not others.
E.g. it's reasonable to use single buffers for RX rings but
sg or indirect for TX rings of the network device.
Generic configuration space will be extended so features can
be negotiated per ring.
* Selective use of descriptors
As described above, descriptors with NEXT bit set are part of a
scatter/gather chain and so do not have to cause device to write a used
descriptor out.
Similarly, driver can set a flag VRING_DESC_F_MORE in the descriptor to
signal to device that it does not have to write out the used descriptor
as it is part of a batch of descriptors. Device has two options (similar
to VRING_DESC_F_NEXT):
Device can write out the same number of descriptors for the batch,
setting VRING_DESC_F_MORE for all but the last descriptor.
Driver will ignore all used descriptors with VRING_DESC_F_MORE bit set.
Device only writes out a single descriptor for the whole batch.
However, to keep device and driver in sync, it then skips a number of
descriptors corresponding to the length of the batch before writing out
the next used descriptor.
After detecting a used descriptor driver must find out the length of the
batch that it built in order to know where to look for the next
device descriptor.
TODO (blocker): skipping descriptors for selective and
scatter/gather seem to be only requested with in-order right now. Let's
require in-order for this skipping? This will simplify the accounting
by driver.
* Interrupt/event suppression
virtio 1.0 has two mechanisms for suppression but only
one can be used at a time. we pack them together
in a structure - one for interrupts, one for notifications:
struct event {
__le16 idx;
__le16 flags;
}
Both fields would be optional, with a feature bit:
VIRTIO_F_EVENT_IDX
VIRTIO_F_EVENT_FLAGS
Flags can be used like in virtio 1.0, by storing a special
value there:
#define VRING_F_EVENT_ENABLE 0x0
#define VRING_F_EVENT_DISABLE 0x1
Event index includes the index of the descriptor
which should trigger the event, and the wrap counter
in the high bit.
In that case, interrupt triggers when descriptor is written at a given
location in the ring (or skipped in case of NEXT/MORE).
If both features are negotiated, a special flags value
can be used to switch to event idx:
#define VRING_F_EVENT_IDX 0x2
* Available notification
Driver currently writes out the queue number to device to
kick off ring processing.
As queue number is currently 16 bit, we can extend that
to additionally include the offset within ring of the descriptor
which triggered the kick event in bits 16 to 30,
and the wrap counter in the high bit (31).
Device is allowed to pre-fetch descriptors beyond the specified
offset but is not required to do so.
* TODO: interrupt coalescing
Does it make sense just for networking or for all devices?
If later should we make it a per ring or a global feature?
* TODO: event index/flags in device memory?
Should we move the event index/flags to device memory?
Might be helpful for hardware configuration so they do not
need to do DMA reads to check whether interrupt is needed.Agreed. This also resembles physical devices more closely.
OTOH maybe interrupt coalescing is sufficient for this.
* TODO: Device specific descriptor flags
We have a lot of unused space in the descriptor. This can be put to
good use by reserving some flag bits for device use.
For example, network device can set a bit to request
that header in the descriptor is suppressed
(in case it's all 0s anyway). This reduces cache utilization.
Note: this feature can be supported in virtio 1.0 as well,
as we have unused bits in both descriptor and used ring there.
* TODO: Descriptor length in device descriptors
Some devices use identically-sized buffers in all descriptors.
Ignoring length for driver descriptors there could be an option too.
* TODO: Writing at an offset
Some devices might want to write into some descriptors
at an offset, the offset would be in reserved field in the descriptor,
possibly a descriptor flag could indicate this:
#define VRING_DESC_F_OFFSET 0x0020
How exactly to use the offset would be device specific,
for example it can be used to align beginning of packet
in the 1st buffer for mergeable buffers to cache line boundary
while also aligning rest of buffers.
* TODO: Non power-of-2 ring sizes
As the ring simply wraps around, there's no reason to
require ring size to be power of two.
It can be made a separate feature though.
TODO: limits on buffer alignment/size
Seems to be useful for RX for networking.
Is there a need to negotiate above in a generic way
or is this a networking specific optimization?
TODO: expose wrap counters to device for debugging
TODO: expose last avail/used offsets to device/driver for debugging
TODO: ability to reset individual rings
---
Note: should this proposal be accepted and approved, one or more
claims disclosed to the TC admin and listed on the Virtio TC
IPR page https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/ipr.php
might become Essential Claims.
Note: the page above is unfortunately out of date and out of
my hands. I'm in the process of updating ipr disclosures
in github instead. Will make sure all is in place before
this proposal is put to vote. As usual this TC operates under the
Non-Assertion Mode of the OASIS IPR Policy, which protects
anyone implementing the virtio spec.
--
MST
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org