M Michael S. Tsirkin #
Message details and related content
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command. Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the request and verifying the reset state would require an expensive state change. To avoid that, add a status bit to the feature register used during feature negotiation between host and guest. Set the bit for virtio-net, which supports the feature. Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
All virtio 1 devices have the reset feature so maybe guest does
not need this flag. Does device need it? Does device really
care that guest can't recover?
quoted hunk
--- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 ++ include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 5e349226f7c1..15483a982106 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c@@ -2801,12 +2801,14 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTNET_FEATURES, + VIRTIO_F_CAN_RESET, }; static unsigned int features_legacy[] = { VIRTNET_FEATURES, VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO, VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT, + VIRTIO_F_CAN_RESET, }; static struct virtio_driver virtio_net_driver = {diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h index 308e2096291f..726be44a04d3 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ * suppressed them? */ #define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY 24 +/* Driver supports the VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command */ +#define VIRTIO_F_CAN_RESET 25 + /* Can the device handle any descriptor layout? */ #define VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT 27 #endif /* VIRTIO_CONFIG_NO_LEGACY */-- 2.14.1.342.g6490525c54-goog