Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] qemu: Implement virtio-pstore device
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-07-30 08:39:46
Also in:
kvm, lkml, qemu-devel
Hello, On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:08:41PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 01:56:07PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:39:53PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:02:54AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:08:30AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:quoted
+static ssize_t virtio_pstore_do_write(VirtIOPstore *s, struct iovec *out_sg, + unsigned int out_num, + struct virtio_pstore_req *req) +{ + char path[PATH_MAX]; + int fd; + ssize_t len; + unsigned short type; + int flags = O_WRONLY | O_CREAT; + + /* we already consume the req */ + iov_discard_front(&out_sg, &out_num, sizeof(*req)); + + virtio_pstore_to_filename(s, path, sizeof(path), req); + + type = le16_to_cpu(req->type); + + if (type == VIRTIO_PSTORE_TYPE_DMESG) { + flags |= O_TRUNC; + } else if (type == VIRTIO_PSTORE_TYPE_CONSOLE) { + flags |= O_APPEND; + } + + fd = open(path, flags, 0644); + if (fd < 0) { + error_report("cannot open %s", path); + return -1; + } + len = writev(fd, out_sg, out_num); + close(fd); + + return len;All this is blocking VM until host io completes.Hmm.. I don't know about the internals of qemu. So does it make guest stop? If so, that's what I want to do for _DMESG. :) As it's called only on kernel oops I think it's admittable. But for _CONSOLE, it needs to do asynchronously. Maybe I can add a thread to do the work.Please look at include/io/channel.h. QEMU is event-driven and tends to use asynchronous I/O instead of spawning threads. The include/io/ APIs allow you to do asynchronous I/O in the event loop.That is true, except for I/O to/from plain files - the QIOChannelFile impl doesn't do anything special (yet) to make that work correctly in non-blocking mode. Of course that could be fixed...
Yep, I don't know how I can use the QIOChannelFile for async IO. AFAICS it's just a wrapper for normal readv/writev. Who is responsible to do these IO when I use the IO channel API? Also does it guarantee that all IOs are processed in order? Thanks, Namhyung