[PATCH v3 2/4] x86: drop a comment left over from X86_OOSTORE
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-01-13 20:12:42
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
the rest, x86 architecture (32-bit and 64-bit) · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen
The comment about wmb being non-nop to deal with non-intel CPUs is a
left over from before commit 09df7c4c8097 ("x86: Remove
CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE").
It makes no sense now: in particular, wmb is not a nop even for regular
intel CPUs because of weird use-cases e.g. dealing with WC memory.
Drop this comment.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
index a65bdb1..a291745 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h@@ -11,10 +11,6 @@ */ #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 -/* - * Some non-Intel clones support out of order store. wmb() ceases to be a - * nop for these. - */ #define mb() asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)", "mfence", \ X86_FEATURE_XMM2) ::: "memory", "cc") #define rmb() asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)", "lfence", \
--
MST