[PATCH 30/34] virtio_ring: update weak barriers to use __smp_XXX
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2015-12-30 13:26:21
Also in:
linux-arch
Subsystem:
the rest, virtio core · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, "Michael S. Tsirkin", Jason Wang
virtio ring uses smp_wmb on SMP and wmb on !SMP, the reason for the later being that it might be talking to another kernel on the same SMP machine. This is exactly what __smp_XXX barriers do, so switch to these instead of homegrown ifdef hacks. Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alexander Duyck <redacted> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> --- include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 25 ++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
index 67e06fe..71176be 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ * anyone care? * * For virtio_pci on SMP, we don't need to order with respect to MMIO - * accesses through relaxed memory I/O windows, so smp_mb() et al are + * accesses through relaxed memory I/O windows, so __smp_mb() et al are * sufficient. * * For using virtio to talk to real devices (eg. other heterogeneous
@@ -21,11 +21,10 @@ * actually quite cheap. */ -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP static inline void virtio_mb(bool weak_barriers) { if (weak_barriers) - smp_mb(); + __smp_mb(); else mb(); }
@@ -33,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void virtio_mb(bool weak_barriers) static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers) { if (weak_barriers) - smp_rmb(); + __smp_rmb(); else rmb(); }
@@ -41,26 +40,10 @@ static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers) static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers) { if (weak_barriers) - smp_wmb(); + __smp_wmb(); else wmb(); } -#else -static inline void virtio_mb(bool weak_barriers) -{ - mb(); -} - -static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers) -{ - rmb(); -} - -static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers) -{ - wmb(); -} -#endif struct virtio_device; struct virtqueue;
--
MST