On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:33:20PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
quoted
quoted
+ if (offset + length < offset ||
+ offset + length > pci_resource_len(dev, bar)) {
+ dev_err(&dev->dev,
+ "virtio_pci: virtio capability %u@%u "
+ "out of range on bar %i length %lu\n",
+ length, offset, bar,
+ (unsigned long)pci_resource_len(dev, bar));
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (limit && length > limit)
+ length = limit;
+
I'll have to review the above carefully. Hopefully next week.
Any reason you didn't just move code out map_capability to a helper,
without changes? Would have made review easier.
Doesn't work that easily as there are different things to check.
request_capability verifies the capability itself only, map_capability
has a bunch of additional range checks because it supports partial maps.
So use a helper, call it from both places with slightly
different parameters.
quoted
I don't see reasons to request regions that we aren't going to
claim ...
I had it that way first, simply calling request_mem_region from
map_capability. But then you get tons of notify entries in /proc/iomem,
and keeping track of the requested regions (for cleanup in
virtio_pci_modern_remove) also is more complicated than with a simple
set of 4 fixed regions.
In case of notify I guess we can limit the resource to 64K VQs,
will help keep it simple.
quoted
quoted
+ return request_mem_region(pci_resource_start(dev, bar) + offset,
+ length, name);
Hmm this seems wrong, resource can be IO, not just memory.
Right (not the case in the current qemu implementation, but still ...).
quoted
quoted
+ vp_dev->res_common = request_capability(pci_dev, common, 0,
Please make limit = sizeof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg) and not 0.
quoted
+ "virtio-pci-common");
+ vp_dev->res_isr = request_capability(pci_dev, isr, 0,
+ "virtio-pci-isr");
And here, 1.
quoted
+ vp_dev->res_notify = request_capability(pci_dev, notify, 0,
+ "virtio-pci-notify");
+ if (device) {
+ vp_dev->res_device = request_capability(pci_dev, device,
+ PAGE_SIZE,
+ "virtio-pci-device");
+ }
Please drop {} around a single statement.
I'll fix them for the next version.
cheers,
Gerd