Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2017-09-25
STALE3181d
Revisions (5)
  1. v2 [diff vs current]
  2. v4 [diff vs current]
  3. v5 [diff vs current]
  4. v5 [diff vs current]
  5. v5 current

[PATCH v5 REPOST 5/6] hw_random: don't double-check old_rng.

From: Amos Kong <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-08 08:53:01
Also in: kvm, linux-crypto, lkml
Subsystem: hardware random number generator core, the rest · Maintainers: Olivia Mackall, Herbert Xu, Linus Torvalds

From: Rusty Russell <redacted>

Interesting anti-pattern.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <redacted>
---
 drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
index 067270b..a9286bf 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
@@ -476,14 +476,13 @@ int hwrng_register(struct hwrng *rng)
 	}
 
 	old_rng = current_rng;
+	err = 0;
 	if (!old_rng) {
 		err = hwrng_init(rng);
 		if (err)
 			goto out_unlock;
 		set_current_rng(rng);
-	}
-	err = 0;
-	if (!old_rng) {
+
 		err = register_miscdev();
 		if (err) {
 			drop_current_rng();
-- 
1.9.3
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help