Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2014-12-01

Re: [PATCH v7 16/46] virtio_blk: v1.0 support

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2014-12-01 11:47:09
Also in: linux-api, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:33:15PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:26:58 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
For some places on data path, it might be worth it
to cache the correct value e.g. as part of device
structure. This replaces a branch with a memory load,
so the gain would have to be measured, best done
separately?
I think we'll want to do some measuring once the basic structure is
in place anyway.
What's meant by in place here?
We should make sure that e.g. s390 only takes minor
hit due to all that swapping that is needed for standard-compliant
devices. Caching the value might certainly help in some paths.
Well, this is queued in linux-next for 3.19, so
now's the time to do it :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help