Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] vhost: support urgent descriptors
From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-22 03:30:30
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On 09/20/2014 06:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 19/09/2014 09:10, Jason Wang ha scritto:quoted
quoted
quoted
- if (!vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX)) { + if (vq->urgent || !vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX)) {So the urgent descriptor only work when event index was not enabled? This seems suboptimal, we may still want to benefit from event index even if urgent descriptor is used. Looks like we need return true here when vq->urgent is true?Its ||, not &&. Without event index, all descriptors are treated as urgent. Paolo
The problem is if vq->urgent is true, the patch checks VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT bit. This bit were set unconditionally in virtqueue_enable_cb() regardless of event index feature and cleared unconditionally in virtqueue_disable_cb(). So virtqueue_enable_cb() was used to not only publish a new event index but also enable the urgent descriptor. And virtqueue_disable_cb() disabled all interrupts including the urgent descriptor. Guest won't get urgent interrupts by just adding virtqueue_add_outbuf_urgent() since what it needs is to enable and disable interrupt for !urgent descriptor. Btw, not sure "urgent" is a suitable name, since interrupt is often slow in kvm guest. And in fact virtio-net will probably use "urgent" descriptor for those packets (e.g stream packets who can be delayed a little bit to batch more bytes from userspace) who was not urgent compared to other packets.