On (Mon) 11 Aug 2014 [15:11:03], H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/11/2014 11:49 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
quoted
The khwrngd thread is started when a hwrng device of sufficient
quality is registered. The virtio-rng device is backed by the
hypervisor, and we trust the hypervisor to provide real entropy. A
malicious hypervisor is a scenario that's ruled out, so we are certain
the quality of randomness we receive is perfectly trustworthy. Hence,
we use 100% for the factor, indicating maximum confidence in the source.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <redacted>
It isn't "ruled out", it is just irrelevant: if the hypervisor is
malicious, the quality of your random number source is the least of your
problems.
Yea; I meant ruled out in that sense. Should the commit msg be more
verbose?
Amit