[PATCH RFC V9 2/19] x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks
STALE4833d
From: Raghavendra K T <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-01 19:18:05
Also in:
kvm, lkml, xen-devel
Subsystem:
the rest, x86 architecture (32-bit and 64-bit) · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen
Revision v9 of 6 in this series.
Revisions (6)
x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks From: Raghavendra K T <redacted> The code size expands somewhat, and its better to just call a function rather than inline it. Thanks Jeremy for original version of ARCH_NOINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK config patch, which is simplified. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <redacted> --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 685692c..80fcc4b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig@@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ config PARAVIRT_DEBUG config PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS bool "Paravirtualization layer for spinlocks" depends on PARAVIRT && SMP + select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK ---help--- Paravirtualized spinlocks allow a pvops backend to replace the spinlock implementation with something virtualization-friendly