Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2013-04-01

Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: console: add locking around c_ovq operations

From: Amit Shah <hidden>
Date: 2013-03-29 11:00:39

On (Fri) 29 Mar 2013 [08:29:01], Asias He wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:58:33PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
quoted
When multiple ovq operations are being performed (lots of open/close
operations on virtio_console fds), the __send_control_msg() function can
get confused without locking.

A simple recipe to cause badness is:
* create a QEMU VM with two virtio-serial ports
* in the guest, do
  while true;do echo abc >/dev/vport0p1;done
  while true;do echo edf >/dev/vport0p2;done

In one run, this caused a panic in __send_control_msg().  In another, I
got

   virtio_console virtio0: control-o:id 0 is not a head!

This also results repeated messages similar to these on the host:

  qemu-kvm: virtio-serial-bus: Unexpected port id 478762112 for device virtio-serial-bus.0
  qemu-kvm: virtio-serial-bus: Unexpected port id 478762368 for device virtio-serial-bus.0

Reported-by: FuXiangChun <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <redacted>
So, probably this will not apply on virtio-next because of the
virtqueue_add_outbuf change.
Yes, one-line context change.
Anyway,  Reviewed-by: Asias He [off-list ref]
Thanks!

		Amit
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help