Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of buffers
From: Rusty Russell <hidden>
Date: 2013-01-07 01:17:26
Also in:
kvm, linux-scsi, lkml
Paolo Bonzini [off-list ref] writes:
Il 02/01/2013 06:03, Rusty Russell ha scritto:quoted
Paolo Bonzini [off-list ref] writes:quoted
The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations: 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call; 2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be provided as an array of struct scatterlist;Chained scatterlists are a horrible interface, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't support them if there's a need. I think I once even had a patch which passed two chained sgs, rather than a combo sg and two length numbers. It's very old, but I've pasted it below. Duplicating the implementation by having another interface is pretty nasty; I think I'd prefer the chained scatterlists, if that's optimal for you.Unfortunately, that cannot work because not all architectures support chained scatterlists.
WHAT? I can't figure out what an arch needs to do to support this? Why is it an option for archs? Why is sg_chain() even defined for non-ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN? Jens, help!! All archs we care about support them, though, so I think we can ignore this issue for now.
(Also, as you mention chained scatterlists are horrible. They'd happen to work for virtio-scsi, but not for virtio-blk where the response status is part of the footer, not the header).
We lost that debate 5 years ago, so we hack around it as needed. We can add helpers to append if we need. Thanks, Rusty.