Amit Shah [off-list ref] writes:

On (Tue) 11 Dec 2012 [09:39:41], Rusty Russell wrote:

quoted

Amit Shah [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote:

quoted

Amit Shah [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

From: Sjur Brændeland <redacted>

Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed. Rproc_serial
communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave buffers in
the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-queue
as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume them
yet.

[Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.]

Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <redacted>

I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my
virtio-next branch now.

Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in
virtio-next.  Did anything change in the meantime?

Hmm:

40e625ac50f40d87ddba93280d0a503425aa68e9?

I'm sorry, I meant the remoteproc code, not this patch.

Still waiting for v9, AFIACT?

Sjur, we're in the merge window now, so it'd be nice to get your latest
version on top of linux-next (or simply my virtio-next git tree) today.

Thanks,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization