Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2012-11-30

Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 12/12] VMCI: Some header and config files.

flat view

From: Dmitry Torokhov <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-30 20:09:41
Also in: lkml

On Friday, November 30, 2012 10:57:55 AM Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:45:44AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
However you snipped the rest of my reply: do we really need to renumber
ioctls? There is no benefit for the driver as its ioctl handler does
not parse the numbers into components.
I don't know if you need to renumber, I really don't understand what you
were trying to do with this code, and as it was acting differently from
all other kernel ioctl declarations, I asked for some clarity.

If you can rewrite it to look sane, and keep the same numbers, that's
fine with me.
OK, it looks like we can redo them as:

#define IOCTL_VMCI_VERSION		_IO(7, 0x9f)    /* 1951 */
#define IOCTL_VMCI_INIT_CONTEXT		_IO(7, 0xa0)    /* 1952 */

Is this acceptable?

Thanks,
Dmitry
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help