Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2012-09-09

Re: [PATCHv3] virtio-spec: virtio network device multiqueue support

From: Sasha Levin <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-07 00:17:08
Also in: kvm, netdev

Hi Michael,

On 09/06/2012 02:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Add multiqueue support to virtio network device.
Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE for this feature, a new
configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of
virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_STEERING to program
packet steering.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Some comments about the change:

 - "The following four read-only fields only exists if VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE
is set." => Should be "exist" (I think).

 - "When rule is set to VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_STEERING_RX_FOLLOWS_TX packets are
steered by driver to the first (param+1) multiqueue virtqueues
transmitq1...transmitqN;" - Why param+1?  I thought we ignore the default
transmit/receive in this case.

 - "As selecting a specific steering ais n optimization feature" - "is an".

 - It's mentioned several times that the ability to read the steering rule from
the virtio-net config is there for debug reasons. Is it really necessary? I
think it's the first time I see debug features go in as part of the spec.

 - I'm slightly confused, why are there both receive and transmit steering? I
can't find a difference in the way to configure the rule for transmit and
receive. Is it a plan for the future to allow different rules for tx and rx? If
so, shouldn't we use different ctrl commands (
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_TX_STEERING/VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RX_STEERING)?

 - "When rule is set to VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_STEERING_SINGLE all packets are steered
to the default virtqueue receveq (0);" - "receiveq (0)"



Thanks,
Sasha
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help