Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add vhost-blk support
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: 2012-07-17 10:14:33
Also in:
kvm, linux-fsdevel, lkml
Il 17/07/2012 11:45, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
quoted
So it begs the question, is it going to be used in production, or just a useful reference tool?Sticking to raw already makes virtio-blk faster, doesn't it? In that vhost-blk looks to me like just another optimization option. Ideally I think user just should not care where do we handle virtio: in-kernel or in userspace. One can imagine it being enabled/disabled automatically if none of the features unsupported by it are used.
Ok, that would make more sense. One difference between vhost-blk and vhost-net is that for vhost-blk there are also management actions that would trigger the switch, for example a live snapshot. So a prerequisite for vhost-blk would be that it is possible to disable it on the fly while the VM is running, as soon as all in-flight I/O is completed. (Note that, however, this is not possible for vhost-scsi, because it really exposes different hardware to the guest. It must not happen that a kernel upgrade or downgrade toggles between userspace SCSI and vhost-scsi, for example).
quoted
having to support the API; having to handle transition from one more thing when something better comes out.Well this is true for any code. If the limited featureset which vhost-blk can accelerate is something many people use, then accelerating by 5-15% might outweight support costs.
It is definitely what people use if they are interested in performance. Paolo