Re: 0xB16B00B5? Really? (was Re: Move hyperv out of the drivers/staging/ directory)
From: richard -rw- weinberger <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-20 15:04:04
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-07-21 · Re: 0xB16B00B5? Really? (was Re: Move hyperv out of the drivers/staging/ directory) · <hidden>
- 2012-07-20 · RE: 0xB16B00B5? Really? (was Re: Move hyperv out of the drivers/staging/ directory) · KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
- 2012-07-20 · RE: 0xB16B00B5? Really? (was Re: Move hyperv out of the drivers/staging/ directory) · KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
- 2012-07-19 · Re: 0xB16B00B5? Really? (was Re: Move hyperv out of the drivers/staging/ directory) · "Greg KH (gregkh@linuxfoundation.org)" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
- 2012-07-19 · Re: 0xB16B00B5? Really? (was Re: Move hyperv out of the drivers/staging/ directory) · Anthony Liguori <hidden>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM, KY Srinivasan [off-list ref] wrote:
Thank you for your interest in fixing this problem. When we decide to change this ID, we will conform to the MSFT guidelines on constructing this guest ID.
I'm wondering why it hasn't been conform to the MSFT guidelines from the very beginning on? -- Thanks, //richard