Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2012-06-26 22:22:11
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11:55PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:40 PM To: KY Srinivasan Cc: apw@canonical.com; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org; ohering@suse.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:29:49AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:26 AM To: KY Srinivasan Cc: apw@canonical.com; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; ohering@suse.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:06:53PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:quoted
Are you still missing it; do you want me to resend the whole set?Nope, it showed up a few hours later, thanks. You really should get that fixed...Greg, some additional testing with VM replication on Windows Server 2012 has revealed some issues with this patch-set. Please drop the patch set, I will fix the problem and resend it.Thanks for letting me know, now dropped. But, for the next round, I suggest you run this patchset by the netdev developers, as I think you are doing things in an "odd" way for some of the ip determination.Will do. Just curious; can you be more explicit on what part appeared "odd" to you.
The fact that it was Red Hat specific was the main part, this should be done in a standard way, with standard tools, right? greg k-h