-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 1:38 AM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; ohering@suse.com; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org; Alan Stern;
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Drivers: hv: Support the newly introduced KVP
messages in the driver

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:36:16PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:

quoted

Dan,

Sorry I could not get back to you earlier. You are right, in that I am trusting
the host! I am of the firm belief that in a virtualized environment, if you don't

trust

quoted

the host, there is not a whole lot you can do in a guest! I have had this

arguments

quoted

with other on this mailing list in the past. Having said that, I think we have spent

more

quoted

time debating this than we should; your proposal is reasonable and I will go

ahead and

quoted

re-spin those patches based on your comments. I should be posting them

shortly.

quoted

Regards,

It's not about trusting the host or not trusting the host.  It's
about "if you're going to specify a limitter, it can't be off by one
even if you don't expect to hit the limit".

But thanks for redoing these.

Thank you, for taking the time to review.

Regards,

K. Y