Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear()

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear() · Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> · 2012-01-20
Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear() · Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> · 2012-01-20
Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear() · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-01-20
Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear() · Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> · 2012-01-20
Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear() · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-01-20
Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear() · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-01-20
Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear() · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-01-20
Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear() · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-01-21

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2012-01-20 23:11:51
Also in: lkml, xen-devel

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:09:38 -0500
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Did you test this patch with a large amount of minors?

Sorry I didn't do runtime test.

Please do.

The poor guy probably doesn't know how to test it and surely it would
be quite a lot of work for him to do so.

Overall, it would be much more efficient if the tester of this code is
someone who is set up to easily apply the patch and test it.  ie: the
code maintainer(s).

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help