Re: [PULL] virtio and lguest
From: Rusty Russell <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-13 03:25:13
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:29:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Rusty Russell [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Amit Shah (12): virtio: pci: switch to new PM APIHmm. Afaik, this is broken, or at least not complete. Sure, it switches to the new PM API, but it still does the PCI ops itself. It should not need to - the PCI layer will do the power state and standard PCI device state saving. And setting the PCI_D3hot state when shared interrupts can still happen at suspend time is just a bad idea. So I think you're doing extra work and introducing bugs by doing so - the default PCI bus operations should already do all you do, just do it better. And then you can use the SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() to build the dev_pm_ops structure and get all the normal cases right automatically. I don't know if there is any particularly good example of this, but you can see some of the network drivers for examples of this. Notice how they don't need to worry about PCI power states etc at all, they just need to worry about the actual chip suspend/resume (and for a network driver, you'd do the netif_device_detach/netif_device_attach etc)
Ok, I'll confess complete ignorance, and wait for Amit to respond. I must admit that PM for virtual devices is not a personal priority... Thanks, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization