RE: [PATCH 019/117] Staging: hv: vmbus: Cleanup vmbus_uevent() code
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Date: 2011-08-24 14:12:47
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:00 PM To: KY Srinivasan Cc: gregkh@suse.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH 019/117] Staging: hv: vmbus: Cleanup vmbus_uevent() code On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:38:09AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 6:50 PM To: KY Srinivasan Cc: gregkh@suse.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH 019/117] Staging: hv: vmbus: Cleanup vmbus_uevent()codequoted
quoted
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:46:07AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:quoted
Now generate appropriate uevent based on the modalias string. As part ofthis,quoted
quoted
quoted
cleanup the existing uevent code.Note, you just change the user api here, did you have tools that relied on the old format? If so, they just broke :(Prior to this, I don't think autoloading worked the way it should for these modules.It didn't? How did the mouse driver get autoloaded then, through the pci/dmi tables?
You are right, prior to this all drivers were loaded using pci/dmi signatures. Regards, K. Y